'Family glitch' in health law could be painful:
"Congress defined "affordable" as 9.5% or less of an employee's wages, mostly to make sure people did not leave their workplace plans for subsidized coverage through the exchanges.
But the "error" was that it only applies to the employee — and not his or her family.
So, if an employer offers a woman affordable insurance, but doesn't provide it for her family, they cannot get subsidized help through the state health exchanges."
2400 pages.
Over a million words.
And who know how many millions of tax dollars spent on brewing up this paper monstrosity.
And billions of "juice" to get it passed.
And it still looks like it was written by a 4th grader on crack!
No comments:
Post a Comment