New Study Is A ‘Death Blow’ To Global Warming Hysteria

New Study Is A ‘Death Blow’ To Global Warming Hysteria | The Daily Caller:
"...The Max Planck study suggests “that aerosol radiative forcing is less negative and more certain than is commonly believed.”
In layman’s terms, aerosols are offsetting less global warming than was previously thought.
And if aerosols aren’t causing as much cooling, it must mean carbon dioxide must be causing less warming than climate models predict.
“Going forward we should expect less warming from future greenhouse gas emissions than climate models are projecting,” write climate scientists Pat Michaels and Chip Knappenberger with the libertarian Cato Institute, adding that this study could be a “death blow” to global warming hysteria.
...Basically, the IPCC says aerosols deflect a lot of warming — the opposite of the Max Planck study’s finding.
...But incorporate the Max Planck study results and warming would only be as high as 1.8 degrees Celsius — less than half what the IPCC originally predicted.
Michaels and Knappenberger say Lewis’s findings basically eliminate “the possibility of catastrophic climate change—that is, climate change that proceeds at a rate that exceeds our ability to keep up...”