...For the past two weeks, Reason, a magazine dedicated to "Free Minds and Free Markets," has been barred by an order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York from speaking publicly about a grand jury subpoena that court sent to Reason.com.
The subpoena demanded the records of six people who left hyperbolic comments at the website about the federal judge who oversaw the controversial conviction of Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht.
Gillespie noted that Forrest "more than threw the book" at Ulbricht by giving him a life sentence, which was a punishment "beyond even what prosecutors...asked for."
...In the comments section of the post, six readers published reactions that drew the investigative ire of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
This is the first time Reason.com has received such a subpoena from any arm of government.
...U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara subpoenaed all of the identifying information we had about the authors of such comments as, "Its (sic) judges like these that should be taken out back and shot."
And, "Why waste ammunition? Wood chippers get the message across clearly. Especially if you feed them in feet first."
This last comment is a well-known Internet reference to the Coen brothers' movie Fargo.
The comments are hyperbolic, in questionable taste–and fully within the norms of Internet commentary.
...To live in a world where every stray, overheated Internet comment—however trollish and stupid it may be—can be interpreted as an actionable threat to be investigated by a federal grand jury is to live in a world where the government is telling the public and media to just shut up already.
As we gather and publish more information on just how often this sort of thing happens, we pledge to always be on the side of more speech rather than less.
No comments:
Post a Comment