Your tax dollars at work-----New Article Blasts Feds’ ‘Pseudoscientific Methods’ For Establishing Dietary Guidelines

New Article Blasts Feds’ ‘Pseudoscientific Methods’ For Establishing Dietary Guidelines - Reason.com:
"A new article by University of Alabama-Birmingham researcher Edward Archer and colleagues Gregory Pavela and Carl Lavie, published this week in the Mayo Clinic Proceedings, argues that the conclusions drawn by the federal government's controversial Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC) rest on fatally flawed assumptions about unusable data. 
Consequently, the authors conclude that the DGAC's work—and the research used to support that work—is so off base as to be scientifically useless."