"...In the cases the NYT seems most to abhor, random crazy people have attacked abortion clinics and churches.
This is horrible and more than extremely regrettable but far more infrequent and considerably less violent than the attacks in the name of Allah happening on an almost daily basis across the world from Mumbai to San Bernardino.
These attacks, what the NYT blithely calls "sprees," are nearly always accompanied by overt declarations of war against Western civilization.
You would have to be, in Andy McCarthy's words, willfully blind to find them in any way equivalent.
I wouldn't doubt the editorial board of the NYT is also aware that the policy of the Nazi party was pretty close to what they are recommending, the confiscation of guns -- for the National Socialists so that they could be sure they were only in the hands of those deemed acceptable (not Jews, etc.).
To use Orwell's term this time, that would make the NYT "objectively pro-fascist."
But perhaps less harmful than our own government.
Reacting to the San Bernardino Islamic ideology-based terror rampage... er, workplace violence... the first thing out of our attorney general's mouth was to warn James Comey, director of the FBI, that the real danger from this event was anti-Muslim backlash and to watch his language.
In other words, don't call a duck a duck.
According to DCWhispers, the order had come down from Obama and Jarrett to Lynch, in which order was unspecified, that Comey's statements should be bowdlerized.
It was.
Okay, I've had it.
Mr. LaPierre, as I told you,
I'm in.
You've got another one-time Jewish lefty in the NRA.
That should make at least one of us."
No comments:
Post a Comment