THERE'S A REASON WE MOSTLY HEAR ABOUT WHITE 'MICRO–AGGRESSIONS'

Ann Coulter - June 24, 2015 - THERE'S A REASON WE MOSTLY HEAR ABOUT WHITE 'MICRO–AGGRESSIONS'
The massacre of black churchgoers in Charleston by an evil psycho is a hideous thing.
The case is especially sickening because the victims were chosen specifically because of their race. Thank God it's extremely rare for whites to target black people for attack.
And yet the public is being told by The New York Times, The Washington Post, MSNBC and Salon that the Charleston massacre is proof that we live in a country packed with marauding racist murderers. 
It's like saying we have an epidemic of men flying gyrocopters onto Capitol Hill.
Yes, there's that one time, but I notice you keep citing the same case.
In The Washington Post, for example, columnist Lonnae O'Neal blamed the Charleston attack on "white supremacy," claiming that "racial sickness is all around us." 
(I guess the one upside of the horror in South Carolina is that we can FINALLY have a national conversation about race.)
The media's WHITES ARE TERRORIZING BLACKS campaign reflects reality as accurately as the media's other campaign, WHITE MALE COLLEGE STUDENTS ARE RAPING EVERYTHING IN SIGHT!
In a country of more than 300 million people, everything will happen eventually.
That doesn't make it a trend.
Go up to any ordinary, sentient person and ask: Which race assaults the other race more?
Remember the "knockout game" -- or as its devotees called it, "polar bear hunting"?
Black teenagers would go looking for white people to knock unconscious with a single punch, videotape the attacks and post them online.
The knockout game was a real trend -- which the media denied was a trend.
Just last month, we saw videos of white reporters from the Daily Caller being mugged by black men in Baltimore.
Ask around.
You might be surprised at how many whites you know have been physically attacked by a black person at least once in their lives..."
Read on.