"In the last three paragraphs, the Times editorial board wrote that the wording of the Second Amendment is “not necessary to debate” and suggested Americans willfully give up their guns to the government “for the good of their fellow citizens.It is not necessary to debate the peculiar wording of the Second Amendment. No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation.
Certain kinds of weapons, like the slightly modified combat rifles used in California, and certain kinds of ammunition, must be outlawed for civilian ownership. It is possible to define those guns in a clear and effective way and, yes, it would require Americans who own those kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens."
Apparently, history must repeat.
Are we truly this stupid?
3 comments:
Stupid should hurt.
Stupid always hurts!
The problem is, it usually hurts the wrong person.
Post a Comment