2016 Presidential Election: Myths Examined

2016 Presidential Election: Myths Examined | National Review:
"Clear choices on the issues in 2016 have been far more distinct than in 1960, 1968, or 1992.
Most of what we read about the election of 2016 was untrue.
Here are the most glaring of the election fables.
 

• HILLARY WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF POLITICALLY TO COME CLEAN LONG AGO 

We hear a few on the left lament Hillary’s two-year stubbornness in stonewalling, lying, and distorting the facts surrounding her unlawful use of a private e-mail server — as if her problems were largely a result of not being candid soon enough.
Nothing could be further from the truth if we define “better” as “more politically viable...”
Lots of myth dispelling here.
Read on!