"...Using data from the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), scholars debunked claims of links between applications of plant protection products containing glyphosate and the occurrence of cancer. This applied to cancers in general, as well as to special cancer types, such as non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which activists have hoped to link with the glyphosate assessment.
Claims of a possible association with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were also not real but it is expected that organic industry front groups like US Right To Know will insist they are important.
So how did IARC create a finding that was so flawed?
They intentionally excluded the Agricultural Health Study, even though data had an additional 11 years..."
Read on!
No comments:
Post a Comment