"Sites like Vox, the Daily Beast, and the Weekly Standard have long praised the dossiers of Robert Mueller’s legal investigative team.
The essays prove mostly the same.
They often employ the same superlative nomenclature: “all-stars,” “dream-team,” “army,” and “professionals.”...
Yet the Mueller legal team’s dossiers also turn out predictably similar.
We are supposed to be awed by past employment in a blue-chip Washington or New York law firm—all the better if the same as Robert Mueller’s own.
Ivy League law school degrees supposedly signal competence.
Power couple bumper stickers (He is married to this judge, or she is wedded to that federal attorney) offer added insurance of excellence...
But lost in all the gentry hyperbole are the two criteria, at this juncture and at this age, that matter far more than post-LSAT credentialing:
We are supposed to be awed by past employment in a blue-chip Washington or New York law firm—all the better if the same as Robert Mueller’s own.
Ivy League law school degrees supposedly signal competence.
Power couple bumper stickers (He is married to this judge, or she is wedded to that federal attorney) offer added insurance of excellence...
But lost in all the gentry hyperbole are the two criteria, at this juncture and at this age, that matter far more than post-LSAT credentialing:
- Does Mueller’s team display a diversity of legal training and experience—which would insulate it from charges of New York-Washington corridor blindness?
- Is his team also immune from charges that it appears politically slanted?
A really good read.
Read on!
No comments:
Post a Comment