"In case you missed it, the US National Security Council has floated a proposal to form a Presidential Committee that will take a hard look at some of the climate change alarmist reports coming out of the federal agencies.
I reported that important event here. The effort is being led by physicist Will Happer, a well known skeptic.
Not surprisingly, the climate alarmists are apoplectic at the very thought that a group of scientists might examine their cherished alarms.
The prestigious magazine/journal “Science” has been a leader in expressing outrage, in a way that clearly shows that they have no idea what is going on.
Their confusion is a fine example of why the Happer Committee is sorely needed.
When a supposedly great scientific publication cannot understand the situation it is worth a closer look.
It turns out Science Mag is operating under a simple fallacy.
We might even call it the “alarmist fallacy” since most alarmists fall for it.
...The alarmist fallacy is journalism ruined by advocacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment