"...The Washington swamp displayed all its corruption skills with lies, deceptions, misrepresentations, and deliberate creation of deceit, during the Kavanaugh hearings.
The willingness of politicians on the left to destroy everything America stands for was frightening.
We watched Senator Blumenthal, who lied about serving in Vietnam when he never left the United States, remind Judge Kavanaugh of a legal maxim “Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus,” false in one thing, false in everything.
The only difference between these and previous similar tactics was boldness..
One sliver of silver lining is in the level of corruption exposed to achieve a political agenda.
Now it is easier for people to grasp the extent of corruption on the greatest deception in history, human-caused global warming (AGW).
It is easier now to get them to understand that the left will do anything to achieve their goal.
The significant differences between AGW and the Kavanaugh debacle were time and extent.
The AGW deception has evolved slowly and insidiously since the late 1960s.
It began as the objective of David Rockefeller’s Club of Rome’s (COR) to control energy and thereby political power.
It is just as corrupting and devastating an attack on American exceptionalism but worse because it is global. The COR say they are
The willingness of politicians on the left to destroy everything America stands for was frightening.
We watched Senator Blumenthal, who lied about serving in Vietnam when he never left the United States, remind Judge Kavanaugh of a legal maxim “Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus,” false in one thing, false in everything.
The only difference between these and previous similar tactics was boldness..One sliver of silver lining is in the level of corruption exposed to achieve a political agenda.
Now it is easier for people to grasp the extent of corruption on the greatest deception in history, human-caused global warming (AGW).
It is easier now to get them to understand that the left will do anything to achieve their goal.
The significant differences between AGW and the Kavanaugh debacle were time and extent.
The AGW deception has evolved slowly and insidiously since the late 1960s.
It began as the objective of David Rockefeller’s Club of Rome’s (COR) to control energy and thereby political power.
It is just as corrupting and devastating an attack on American exceptionalism but worse because it is global. The COR say they are
“a group of world citizens, sharing a common concern for the future of humanity.“
Compare this claim with H. L. Mencken’s observation that,
“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”
America was seen as the greatest threat to their objective, so it became a major target, but it was still only a part of the global control.
COR member Maurice Strong took the urge to rule to the UN where he put it into action.
After spending five days with Strong at the UN, Elaine Dewar summarized his goal in her book Cloak of Green.
COR member Maurice Strong took the urge to rule to the UN where he put it into action.
After spending five days with Strong at the UN, Elaine Dewar summarized his goal in her book Cloak of Green.
Strong was using the U.N. as a platform to sell a global environment crisis and the Global Governance Agenda.
He did this by creating the political monster known as Agenda 21 and creating the science to support the politics through the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Like all deceptions, there are lies within lies and deceptions within deceptions.
Even the selection of terminology and words was deliberately planned to deceive.
For example, the Earth’s atmosphere does not work like a greenhouse.
The analogy was only valuable because it automatically triggers the concept of heat for the public.
The deceivers knew this type of misrepresentation worked because the same people created the term “holes-in-the-ozone.”
They knew there were no holes, but the term implied a leak, a break in the atmosphere, with all the “Chicken Little” the sky is falling fears that engenders.
Like all deceptions, there are lies within lies and deceptions within deceptions.
Even the selection of terminology and words was deliberately planned to deceive.
For example, the Earth’s atmosphere does not work like a greenhouse.
The analogy was only valuable because it automatically triggers the concept of heat for the public.
The deceivers knew this type of misrepresentation worked because the same people created the term “holes-in-the-ozone.”
They knew there were no holes, but the term implied a leak, a break in the atmosphere, with all the “Chicken Little” the sky is falling fears that engenders.
The next example was the word skeptic, which as Michael Shermer explained.
“Scientists are skeptics. It’s unfortunate that the word ‘skeptic’ has taken on other connotations in the culture involving nihilism and cynicism. Really, in its pure and original meaning, it’s just thoughtful inquiry.”
After 1998 the evidence did not fit the AGW theory anymore so by 2004 they changed it from the global warming theory to the climate change theory.
...The most effective deception was the claim that 97% of scientists agree.
It is as false as the whole claim and was also deliberately created..."
Read it all!
...The most effective deception was the claim that 97% of scientists agree.
It is as false as the whole claim and was also deliberately created..."
Read it all!
No comments:
Post a Comment