- "You have a situation where a person owed $8 and lost their house. I mean, how is that equitable?" asked Michigan Supreme Court Justice Richard Bernstein.
...In trying to defend the county's right to seize the full value of Rafaeli's property over a minuscule debt, Bursch had argued that it was impossible for local governments to compensate all homeowners who had been caught in similar circumstances.
The price tag, he estimated, would be more than $2 billion statewide.
..."It may sound unfair on its face," Bursch replied. "But it's also unfair to force those who pay their taxes to subsidize those who don't."
Bernstein was still skeptical. "It was $8," he said. "Couldn't it be a mistake?"
"The counties don't want the property," argued Bursch. "They want the money." Bingo.
Read all.
No comments:
Post a Comment