- Medical professor denounces ‘impact’ rationale: ‘this is not acceptable in science’"
For four days.
Apparently stung by blowback for highlighting research that violates the established orthodoxy on COVID-19, the News-Letter removed the Nov. 22 article, which included several illuminating graphs, but didn’t say anything about it was factually wrong. (It’s archived.)
“Though making clear the need for further research, the article was being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies about the impact of the pandemic,” the newspaper tweeted Thursday night.
“We regret that this article may have contributed to the spread of misinformation about COVID-19.”
MORE: Professor accuses ‘News-Letter’ of publishing anonymous ‘total fabrication’
It’s far from the first student newspaper to issue a mea culpa for coverage that upset a particular interest group but was not factually disputed...Read all.
No comments:
Post a Comment