- In dominant elite discourse, no evidence is needed to brand someone a "white supremacist."
- The belief that it will produce political or personal gain suffices.
Over the next fifteen months, up to and including his acquittal by a jury of his peers on all charges, this label was applied to him more times than one can count by corporate media outlets as though it were proven fact.
Indeed, that Rittenhouse was a "white supremacist” was deemed so unquestionably true that questioning it was cast as evidence of one's own racist inclinations (defending a white supremacist).
Yet all along, there was never any substantial evidence, let alone convincing proof, that it was true...Read all!!!!!
Yet all along, there was never any substantial evidence, let alone convincing proof, that it was true...Read all!!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment