- Dinesh D’Souza’s new documentary "2,000 Mules" raises serious questions about possible skullduggery in the 2020 election, involving absentee ballots across multiple states.
- But neither the liberal media, nor election officials, nor law enforcement seem to have much interest in investigating that potential wrongdoing.
True the Vote was able to isolate specific cellphones that traveled to the locations of the ballot drop boxes that liberals insisted had to be installed because of the COVID-19 epidemic.
...Of course, lots of ordinary voters did travel to drop boxes to drop off their ballots.
Therefore, True the Vote isolated its search to cellphones whose owners appeared to visit more than 10 drop boxes, a very suspicious occurrence for which there does not seem to be a legitimate explanation.
These same cellphones repeatedly visited the addresses of the same five or more liberal nonprofit groups, although they are not named or identified in the documentary...
These same cellphones repeatedly visited the addresses of the same five or more liberal nonprofit groups, although they are not named or identified in the documentary...
- Who were these individuals, the so-called mules, and what were they doing?
- Where did they get these ballots?
- Why were they repeatedly going to absentee-ballot drop box locations?
- Were the ballots legitimately obtained, or were they fraudulent or stolen from voters, or were voters intimidated, pressured, or coerced to hand over their ballots?
- Who was paying them to engage in this behavior, particularly in states like Arizona where vote trafficking—having third parties pick up and deliver absentee ballots—is against the law?
D’Souza’s analysis indicates that the 2,000 mules were on average visiting 38 drop boxes, sometimes in the middle of the night, and often inserting multiple ballots.
Of course, enterprising reporters like the Miami Herald crew who helped the newspaper win a Pulitzer Prize could also use the documentary to try to identify and interview some of these mules and the staff at these nonprofits if they really wanted to get at the truth.
If we still had a healthy fourth estate in this country, that would be a great job for them.
Of course, enterprising reporters like the Miami Herald crew who helped the newspaper win a Pulitzer Prize could also use the documentary to try to identify and interview some of these mules and the staff at these nonprofits if they really wanted to get at the truth.
If we still had a healthy fourth estate in this country, that would be a great job for them.
But apparently there isn’t anyone left in mainstream journalism interested in the truth when it comes to election issues—just regime flunkies paid to criticize D’Souza, or anyone else who even broaches the topic."
No comments:
Post a Comment