Not retracted, quite, as the authors admit that their research and conclusions were flawed, but they don’t go as far as to assert it was bunk.
- It was, in fact, bunk.
I encourage you to read it, although you may have to skip over some more technical criticisms regarding statistical methods.
As the critics asserted, once proper statistical methods were used the results turned out to be very different from the original claims...
The conclusion that gender-affirming care helps patients turned out to be wrong.
As the critics asserted, once proper statistical methods were used the results turned out to be very different from the original claims...
The conclusion that gender-affirming care helps patients turned out to be wrong.
Even the authors of the original study admit that now...
No comments:
Post a Comment