- The 'green' idea is really all about minimal human impact.
- Wind and solar don't fit that definition - By Alex Epstein | Fox News
"...The "green energy" movement claims that it wants cost-effective energy—affordable, reliable, plentiful—just without fossil fuels’ pollution or GHG emissions.
But this is contradicted by its hostility toward clean, non-carbon nuclear and hydro—the most proven alternatives to fossil fuels.
- You might expect the "green energy" movement to be the Number 1 supporter of clean, non-carbon nuclear and hydroelectric energy, but instead, it is the Number 1 opponent.
- "Green" groups have opposed nuclear for decades (leading to crippling costs) and worked to shut down hydroelectric dams.
Why does the "Green" movement oppose nuclear and hydro?...
No comments:
Post a Comment