It was, in fact, bunk.
The Journal Public Discourse has a long and well worth reading article on why the research was terrible, and how they and others successfully pushed to get the correction...
- As the critics asserted, once proper statistical methods were used the results turned out to be very different from the original claims.
- And given the limits of the data collection (they only looked at one year of data) the results would be worse with better data.
The conclusion that gender-affirming care helps patients turned out to be wrong....
No comments:
Post a Comment