The report also said there was a “lack of knowledge regarding the specific footprint of resources” that would secure the inner perimeter — which the Secret Service staff would monitor — and the outside perimeter, which included the AGR complex and which local law enforcement would monitor.
The report said:
The construction of the protected site, along with line of site mitigation to address the vulnerabilities created by the open grounds of the AGR complex, should have been a key objectives of the site advance. The lack of due diligence in site construction was evident. Advance personnel should have reported any discrepancies or lack of clarity to detail and field office supervisors.
The report also said the Secret Service was not even aware of all the local law enforcement who would be involved in securing the outer perimeter and thus, never met with those entities.
No comments:
Post a Comment