Former CIA spy on Clinton emails: 'You and I would get fired and possibly jailed' for this | Washington Examiner:
"Baer said that when he was on assignment, he wasn't allowed to receive messages at that level of classification, and that putting it on a private server or handheld device was a major mistake.
"If this was on her server and it got into her smartphone, there's a big problem there," he claimed. "Seriously, if I had sent a document like this over the open Internet, I'd get fired the same day — escorted to the door, and gone for good, and probably charged with mishandling classified information."
Important stuff you won't get from the liberal media! We do the surfing so you can be informed AND have a life!
Monday, August 17, 2015
How a few D.C. bureaucrats will destroy college football
How a few D.C. bureaucrats will destroy college football - MarketWatch:
"Student athletes aren’t employees, and shouldn’t be allowed to form a union
Women’s athletic scholarships do not constitute a “transfer of economic value.”
The omission of women could pose substantial Title IX problems for universities, because under court interpretations of Title IX women are supposed to be treated the same as men.
Otherwise, according to the Department of Education, their civil rights are violated.
Universities already have to make sure the same proportion of women as men join top division teams, with the result that some men’s teams have closed down because fewer women choose to participate. One can quickly imagine the cries of horror from feminists, the negative headlines, and the flood of lawsuits if male but not female players are permitted to unionize.
Treating football students on scholarship as employees immediately opens a hornets’ nest as to how to treat students who are not on scholarship.
A team could have some students on scholarship and the rest who pay tuition.
Out of 112 players, 85 were on scholarship.
Would the remaining 27 students on the team not form part of the union?
Would they be considered “free riders” in that they might receive benefits of a better schedule without having to pay union dues?
Or, would they be required to pay agency fees to the union, in the same way the public teachers in California have to pay fees to the California Teachers’ Association...?
"Student athletes aren’t employees, and shouldn’t be allowed to form a union
Women’s athletic scholarships do not constitute a “transfer of economic value.”
The omission of women could pose substantial Title IX problems for universities, because under court interpretations of Title IX women are supposed to be treated the same as men.
Otherwise, according to the Department of Education, their civil rights are violated.
Universities already have to make sure the same proportion of women as men join top division teams, with the result that some men’s teams have closed down because fewer women choose to participate. One can quickly imagine the cries of horror from feminists, the negative headlines, and the flood of lawsuits if male but not female players are permitted to unionize.
Treating football students on scholarship as employees immediately opens a hornets’ nest as to how to treat students who are not on scholarship.
A team could have some students on scholarship and the rest who pay tuition.
Out of 112 players, 85 were on scholarship.
Would the remaining 27 students on the team not form part of the union?
Would they be considered “free riders” in that they might receive benefits of a better schedule without having to pay union dues?
Or, would they be required to pay agency fees to the union, in the same way the public teachers in California have to pay fees to the California Teachers’ Association...?
How much will their bailout cost us?-----There is no California
There is no California - Victor Davis Hanson - Page 1:
"...Consider the disconnects:
California's combined income and sales taxes are among the nation's highest, but the state's deficit is still about $16 billion.
It's estimated that more than 2,000 upper-income Californians are leaving per week to flee high taxes and costly regulations, yet California wants to raise taxes even higher; its business climate already ranks near the bottom of most surveys.
Its teachers are among the highest paid on average in the nation, but its public school students consistently test near the bottom of the nation in both math and science.
The state's public employees enjoy some of the nation's most generous pensions and benefits, but California's retirement systems are underfunded by about $300 billion.
The state's gas taxes -- at over 49 cents per gallon -- are among the highest in the nation, but its once unmatched freeways, like 101 and 99, for long stretches have degenerated into potholed, clogged nightmares unchanged since the early 1960s.
The state wishes to borrow billions of dollars to develop high-speed rail, beginning with a little-traveled link between Fresno and Corcoran -- a corridor already served by money-losing Amtrak. Apparently, coastal residents like the idea of European high-speed rail -- as long as noisy and dirty construction does not begin in their backyards.
As gasoline prices soar, California chooses not to develop millions of barrels of untapped oil and even more natural gas off its shores and beneath its interior.
Home to bankrupt green companies like Solyndra, California has mandated that a third of all the energy provided by state utilities soon must come from renewable energy sources -- largely wind and solar, which presently provide about 11 percent of its electricity and almost none of its transportation fuel.
How to explain the seemingly inexplicable?
There is no California, which is a misnomer.
There is no such state.
Instead there are two radically different cultures and landscapes with little in common, each equally dysfunctional in quite different ways.
Apart they are unworldly, together a disaster..."
"...Consider the disconnects:
California's combined income and sales taxes are among the nation's highest, but the state's deficit is still about $16 billion.
It's estimated that more than 2,000 upper-income Californians are leaving per week to flee high taxes and costly regulations, yet California wants to raise taxes even higher; its business climate already ranks near the bottom of most surveys.
Its teachers are among the highest paid on average in the nation, but its public school students consistently test near the bottom of the nation in both math and science.
The state's public employees enjoy some of the nation's most generous pensions and benefits, but California's retirement systems are underfunded by about $300 billion.
The state's gas taxes -- at over 49 cents per gallon -- are among the highest in the nation, but its once unmatched freeways, like 101 and 99, for long stretches have degenerated into potholed, clogged nightmares unchanged since the early 1960s.
The state wishes to borrow billions of dollars to develop high-speed rail, beginning with a little-traveled link between Fresno and Corcoran -- a corridor already served by money-losing Amtrak. Apparently, coastal residents like the idea of European high-speed rail -- as long as noisy and dirty construction does not begin in their backyards.
As gasoline prices soar, California chooses not to develop millions of barrels of untapped oil and even more natural gas off its shores and beneath its interior.
Home to bankrupt green companies like Solyndra, California has mandated that a third of all the energy provided by state utilities soon must come from renewable energy sources -- largely wind and solar, which presently provide about 11 percent of its electricity and almost none of its transportation fuel.
How to explain the seemingly inexplicable?
There is no California, which is a misnomer.
There is no such state.
Instead there are two radically different cultures and landscapes with little in common, each equally dysfunctional in quite different ways.
Apart they are unworldly, together a disaster..."
BOOM: Michelle Obama Furious After What Israel Just Said About Her... This Is Awesome
BOOM: Michelle Obama Furious After What Israel Just Said About Her... This Is Awesome:
"After First Lady Michelle Obama banned American schools from celebrating student birthdays with scrumptious treats like cupcakes, Israel’s Education Ministry decided to do the same thing.
This coincidence had many students in Israel blaming Michelle for this unfortunate twist of fate, and it appears that their criticism was on point."
"After First Lady Michelle Obama banned American schools from celebrating student birthdays with scrumptious treats like cupcakes, Israel’s Education Ministry decided to do the same thing.
This coincidence had many students in Israel blaming Michelle for this unfortunate twist of fate, and it appears that their criticism was on point."
Guardian Angels patrolling NY's Central Park again for first time in 2 decades
Guardian Angels patrolling NY's Central Park again for first time in 2 decades | Daily Mail Online
Guardian Angels are patrolling Central Park again for the first time in two decades amid rise in crime in NYC
Guardian Angels volunteers have made a pointed return to Central Park for one night per week - citing a 26 per cent rise in crime
Founder Curtis Sliwa and eight other Guardian Angels, ranging from graying longtimers to a 20-year-old woman, are patrolling the New York site..."
Guardian Angels are patrolling Central Park again for the first time in two decades amid rise in crime in NYC
Guardian Angels volunteers have made a pointed return to Central Park for one night per week - citing a 26 per cent rise in crime
Founder Curtis Sliwa and eight other Guardian Angels, ranging from graying longtimers to a 20-year-old woman, are patrolling the New York site..."
How Will Liberals Respond to Dogophobic Muslims?
How Will Liberals Respond to Dogophobic Muslims? | PJ Lifestyle
The recent Supreme Court ruling in favor of gay marriage has highlighted once again, as Mark Steyn notes, the precarious alliance between progressives and Muslims: only in the leftist imagination could “a nice chichi gay couple at 27 Elm Street and a fire-breathing imam and his four child brides at 29 Elm Street” be a recipe for social harmony.
Indeed, it once seemed inevitable that the coalition of pro-gay and pro-Islam forces would show visible strain.
But the issue was all but decided without any real contest in 2010 when Judith Butler, the intellectual doyenne of the progressive queer community, declared her primary allegiance to lie with Muslims, even Muslim gay bashers.
She refused to accept an award from a German gay pride organization because it had expressed concern over Muslim anti-gay violence.
While not actually denying Muslim anti-gay violence, Butler made it clear that talking about it is a form of Islamophobia strictly off limits even amongst those gays with reason to fear for their lives.
...Is there any group amongst progressives who might still refuse to become Sharia-compliant?
I hold a small shred of hope for progressive dog owners: that they may find within themselves the heart to stand and say “Thus far and no further!”
Many progressives may still not be aware — given media silence on all criticism of Islam — that many Muslims dislike dogs as “unclean” animals according to Islamic religious edict, insisting that they be kept away from parks, beaches, and taxi cabs.
The treatment of dogs in Islamic countries is worse than inhumane.
The recent Supreme Court ruling in favor of gay marriage has highlighted once again, as Mark Steyn notes, the precarious alliance between progressives and Muslims: only in the leftist imagination could “a nice chichi gay couple at 27 Elm Street and a fire-breathing imam and his four child brides at 29 Elm Street” be a recipe for social harmony.
Indeed, it once seemed inevitable that the coalition of pro-gay and pro-Islam forces would show visible strain.
But the issue was all but decided without any real contest in 2010 when Judith Butler, the intellectual doyenne of the progressive queer community, declared her primary allegiance to lie with Muslims, even Muslim gay bashers.
She refused to accept an award from a German gay pride organization because it had expressed concern over Muslim anti-gay violence.
While not actually denying Muslim anti-gay violence, Butler made it clear that talking about it is a form of Islamophobia strictly off limits even amongst those gays with reason to fear for their lives.
...Is there any group amongst progressives who might still refuse to become Sharia-compliant?
I hold a small shred of hope for progressive dog owners: that they may find within themselves the heart to stand and say “Thus far and no further!”
Many progressives may still not be aware — given media silence on all criticism of Islam — that many Muslims dislike dogs as “unclean” animals according to Islamic religious edict, insisting that they be kept away from parks, beaches, and taxi cabs.
The treatment of dogs in Islamic countries is worse than inhumane.
Doomsday clock for global market crash strikes one minute to midnight as central banks lose control
Doomsday clock for global market crash strikes one minute to midnight as central banks lose control - Telegraph:
When the banking crisis crippled global markets seven years ago, central bankers stepped in as lenders of last resort.
Profligate private-sector loans were moved on to the public-sector balance sheet and vast money-printing gave the global economy room to heal.
Time is now rapidly running out.
From China to Brazil, the central banks have lost control and at the same time the global economy is grinding to a halt.
It is only a matter of time before stock markets collapse under the weight of their lofty expectations and record valuations.
The FTSE 100 has now erased its gains for the year, but there are signs things could get a whole lot worse.
1 - China slowdown
2 - Commodity collapse
3 - Resource sector credit crisis
4 - Dominoes begin to fall
5 - Credit markets roll over
6 - Interest rate shock
7 - Bull market third longest on record
8 - Overvalued US market
When the banking crisis crippled global markets seven years ago, central bankers stepped in as lenders of last resort.
Profligate private-sector loans were moved on to the public-sector balance sheet and vast money-printing gave the global economy room to heal.
Time is now rapidly running out.
From China to Brazil, the central banks have lost control and at the same time the global economy is grinding to a halt.
It is only a matter of time before stock markets collapse under the weight of their lofty expectations and record valuations.
The FTSE 100 has now erased its gains for the year, but there are signs things could get a whole lot worse.
1 - China slowdown
2 - Commodity collapse
3 - Resource sector credit crisis
4 - Dominoes begin to fall
5 - Credit markets roll over
6 - Interest rate shock
7 - Bull market third longest on record
8 - Overvalued US market
Bombshell Reports: Highly Likely That Backup Was Made of Hillary Clinton’s Home Computer Server; 60 Classified Emails Allegedly Identified | Video | TheBlaze.com
Bombshell Reports: Highly Likely That Backup Was Made of Hillary Clinton’s Home Computer Server; 60 Classified Emails Allegedly Identified | Video | TheBlaze.com:
"It’s highly likely that full backup was made of Hillary Clinton’s home computer server, ABC News reported Sunday, citing the Colorado firm that set up the device."
"It’s highly likely that full backup was made of Hillary Clinton’s home computer server, ABC News reported Sunday, citing the Colorado firm that set up the device."
How they "think"....and they're deathly afraid of the Donald--------The G.O.P.’s Misogyny Primary
The G.O.P.’s Misogyny Primary - The New Yorker
The first Republican Presidential debate offered a chance to think about the relationship between misogyny and certain types of opposition to abortion.
In the United States, our most successful demagogues have often become so by making skillful use of whatever the newest media was at the time.
Charles Coughlin, the Catholic priest who railed against Jews and capitalism in the nineteen-thirties, did most of his railing via the radios that the American masses had just recently acquired.
In the early fifties, Joseph McCarthy took advantage of television’s advent to attract gavel-to-gavel attention for his congressional hearings.
Donald Trump is a celebrity demagogue, and, for the moment, anyway, the leading Republican Presidential candidate, because of reality television and Twitter.
Both forms shaped Trump’s persona: he’s their creature.
On his own reality-TV show, “The Apprentice,” and now on the campaign trail, Trump displays the particular personality traits that get amped up, hyped, and rewarded on the crassest of these series: he’s as thin-skinned, tantrum-prone, “outrageous,” and narcissistic as a “Real Housewives” villain.
Trump also does a lot of his posturing on the Internet, where trollish taunts can win you a following, and where women sometimes come in for particular contempt.
He has a taste for that, too, as we all know now, if we didn’t before the debate last Thursday.
Here in America, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, sexism is very much on the wane, but misogyny is not.
Sexism—the conviction that women don’t deserve equal pay, political rights, or access to education—can be combatted by argument, by anti-discrimination laws, and by giving women the opportunity to prove their ability.
Misogyny is not amenable to such advances; they can in some circumstances exacerbate it, though they may drive it underground.
An example of misogyny is when someone online threatens to rape and mutilate a woman whose opinions that person does not like.
Another is when a Presidential candidate says of a female journalist whose questions he finds impertinent, “There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her—wherever.”
The first Republican Presidential debate offered a chance to think about the relationship between misogyny and certain types of opposition to abortion.
In the United States, our most successful demagogues have often become so by making skillful use of whatever the newest media was at the time.
Charles Coughlin, the Catholic priest who railed against Jews and capitalism in the nineteen-thirties, did most of his railing via the radios that the American masses had just recently acquired.
In the early fifties, Joseph McCarthy took advantage of television’s advent to attract gavel-to-gavel attention for his congressional hearings.
Donald Trump is a celebrity demagogue, and, for the moment, anyway, the leading Republican Presidential candidate, because of reality television and Twitter.
Both forms shaped Trump’s persona: he’s their creature.
On his own reality-TV show, “The Apprentice,” and now on the campaign trail, Trump displays the particular personality traits that get amped up, hyped, and rewarded on the crassest of these series: he’s as thin-skinned, tantrum-prone, “outrageous,” and narcissistic as a “Real Housewives” villain.
Trump also does a lot of his posturing on the Internet, where trollish taunts can win you a following, and where women sometimes come in for particular contempt.
He has a taste for that, too, as we all know now, if we didn’t before the debate last Thursday.
Here in America, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, sexism is very much on the wane, but misogyny is not.
Sexism—the conviction that women don’t deserve equal pay, political rights, or access to education—can be combatted by argument, by anti-discrimination laws, and by giving women the opportunity to prove their ability.
Misogyny is not amenable to such advances; they can in some circumstances exacerbate it, though they may drive it underground.
An example of misogyny is when someone online threatens to rape and mutilate a woman whose opinions that person does not like.
Another is when a Presidential candidate says of a female journalist whose questions he finds impertinent, “There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her—wherever.”
Read it all!--A national disgrace!!!-----Hero Marine Nailed for Secret Email: What Did He Do That Hillary Didn’t?
Hero Marine Nailed for Secret Email: What Did He Do That Hillary Didn’t? - The Daily Beast
"Clinton could still become president after her email scandal, but a decorated Marine is being forced out over one classified report he sent to avert a disaster.
No matter how much classified material is found in her personal email server, Hillary Clinton will no doubt continue campaigning to become our next president.
Meanwhile, a decorated Marine officer who has deployed four times faces being discharged from the corps he loves because he used his personal email to send a single classified report as an urgent warning when lives were at stake.
The stateside message from Marine Reserves Major Jason Brezler to Forward Operating Base Delhi in Now Zad, Helmand Province, Afghanistan, went unheeded.
Three young Marines were shot to death as they worked out in a gym by an Afghan teen brought on the base by the same corrupt and double-dealing pedophile police chief whom Brezler had declared to be an immediate threat.
Yet the only person to be investigated in connection with the killings is Brezler, the Marine who sought to prevent them..."
"Clinton could still become president after her email scandal, but a decorated Marine is being forced out over one classified report he sent to avert a disaster.
No matter how much classified material is found in her personal email server, Hillary Clinton will no doubt continue campaigning to become our next president.
Meanwhile, a decorated Marine officer who has deployed four times faces being discharged from the corps he loves because he used his personal email to send a single classified report as an urgent warning when lives were at stake.
The stateside message from Marine Reserves Major Jason Brezler to Forward Operating Base Delhi in Now Zad, Helmand Province, Afghanistan, went unheeded.
Three young Marines were shot to death as they worked out in a gym by an Afghan teen brought on the base by the same corrupt and double-dealing pedophile police chief whom Brezler had declared to be an immediate threat.
Yet the only person to be investigated in connection with the killings is Brezler, the Marine who sought to prevent them..."
NSA Internet Spying Aided by ‘Highly Collaborative’ ‘Partnership’ With AT&T, N.Y. Times Reports | TheBlaze.com
NSA Internet Spying Aided by ‘Highly Collaborative’ ‘Partnership’ With AT&T, N.Y. Times Reports | TheBlaze.com:
"The new information shows the NSA’s decades-long relationship with AT&T has been “considered unique and especially productive,” the Times reported, adding that one document in particular noted the telecommunication company’s “extreme willingness to help” the agency.
More from the Times:"
"The new information shows the NSA’s decades-long relationship with AT&T has been “considered unique and especially productive,” the Times reported, adding that one document in particular noted the telecommunication company’s “extreme willingness to help” the agency.
More from the Times:"
VA hospital repaints Confederate flag in war history mural
VA hospital repaints Confederate flag in war history mural | The American Mirror:
It’s probably a good thing there are no Confederate veterans left, as they would likely be denied care by today’s Veterans Administration.
To most Americans, the Confederate flag is part of our history, but to the VA, it’s a symbol worthy of erasure and political correctness.
Or more specifically, repainting.
The VA Hospital in Grand Junction, Colorado recently commissioned a mural depicting American military history.
It features a solider wearing a gas mask during World War I, as well as a jeep and fighter plane from World War II.
All told, the scenes include imagery from the Revolution to the Iraq war.
It also includes two soldiers eye-to-eye with crossed muskets.
One is in blue while the other is in gray.
Behind them are the Union flag and the Confederate battle flag.
After the mural was made public, a call came to hide the Confederate flag, CBS 4 reports.
Workers covered it with a poster for the VA Medical Foster Program.
“The decision was made that we would have to modify the painting, so we called the artist and asked him to ‘rework’ that part of the mural,” Paul Sweeney, Chief of Customer Relations and Public Affairs at the Grand Junction VA, tells Watchdog.
Sweeney claims the order came from on high..."
It’s probably a good thing there are no Confederate veterans left, as they would likely be denied care by today’s Veterans Administration.
To most Americans, the Confederate flag is part of our history, but to the VA, it’s a symbol worthy of erasure and political correctness.
Or more specifically, repainting.
The VA Hospital in Grand Junction, Colorado recently commissioned a mural depicting American military history.
It features a solider wearing a gas mask during World War I, as well as a jeep and fighter plane from World War II.
All told, the scenes include imagery from the Revolution to the Iraq war.
It also includes two soldiers eye-to-eye with crossed muskets.
One is in blue while the other is in gray.
Behind them are the Union flag and the Confederate battle flag.
After the mural was made public, a call came to hide the Confederate flag, CBS 4 reports.
Workers covered it with a poster for the VA Medical Foster Program.
“The decision was made that we would have to modify the painting, so we called the artist and asked him to ‘rework’ that part of the mural,” Paul Sweeney, Chief of Customer Relations and Public Affairs at the Grand Junction VA, tells Watchdog.
Sweeney claims the order came from on high..."
History for August 17
History for August 17 - On-This-Day.com:
Davy Crockett 1786 - Frontiersman, soldier and politician. He died at the Battle of the Alamo, Samuel Goldwyn (Samuel Goldfish) 1882 - Film producer, Mae West 1893 - Actress, singer, playwrite, screenwriter
Gary Powers (Francis Gary Powers) 1929 - American pilot shot down while flying a reconnaissance mission over Soviet Union airspace (1960 U-2 incident), Robert De Niro 1943 - Actor ("Bang Drum Slowly," "Goodfellas," "Cape Fear"), Nelson Piquet 1952 - Formula One driver
Belinda Carlisle 1958 - Singer (Go-Go's), Sean Penn 1960 - Actor, screenwriter, director, Jim Courier 1970 - Tennis player
1790 - The capital city of the U.S. moved to Philadelphia from New York City.
1807 - Robert Fulton's "North River Steam Boat" (known as the "Clermont") began heading up New York's Hudson River on its successful round-trip to Albany.
1863 - Federal batteries and ships bombarded Fort Sumter in Charleston, SC, harbor during the Civil War.
1894 - John Wadsworth of Louisville set a major league record when he gave up 28 base hits in a single game.
1915 - Charles F. Kettering received a patent for the first electric ignition device.
1945 - The nationalists of Indonesia declared their independence from the Netherlands.
1961 - The Communist East German government completed the construction of the Berlin Wall.
1992 - Woody Allen admitted to being romantically involved with Soon-Yi Previn. The girl was the adopted daughter of Mia Farrow, Allen's longtime companion.
1996 - Ross Perot was announced to be the Reform Party's presidential candidate. It was the party's first-ever candidate.
1998 - U.S. President Clinton admitted to having an improper relationship with Monica Lewinsky, a White House intern.
Sunday, August 16, 2015
Watch: 'Black Lives Matter' Just Got Put In Its Place By Niece Of One Of America's Civil Rights Icons
Watch: 'Black Lives Matter' Just Got Put In Its Place By Niece Of One Of America's Civil Rights Icons:
"Alveda King, the niece of civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., doesn’t think much of the tactics used by the BLM activists. Though the disruptors claim that theirs is a new civil rights movement, King says it’s little more than a distraction."
"Alveda King, the niece of civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., doesn’t think much of the tactics used by the BLM activists. Though the disruptors claim that theirs is a new civil rights movement, King says it’s little more than a distraction."
Marine Discovers Hillary Can Get Away With What He Can't | The Daily Caller
Marine Discovers Hillary Can Get Away With What He Can't | The Daily Caller:
"Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign hasn’t yet been derailed by reports of classified mail on her private email server, but a Marine is finding out the hard way that he won’t be granted the same leeway.
Marine Reserves Major Jason Brezler, who has deployed four times, faces discharge for sending a classified report warning others in Afghanistan of the danger posed by Sarwan Jan, a notoriously corrupt district police chief known for trafficking drugs and weapons and suspected of being a “systematic child rapist,”
"Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign hasn’t yet been derailed by reports of classified mail on her private email server, but a Marine is finding out the hard way that he won’t be granted the same leeway.
Marine Reserves Major Jason Brezler, who has deployed four times, faces discharge for sending a classified report warning others in Afghanistan of the danger posed by Sarwan Jan, a notoriously corrupt district police chief known for trafficking drugs and weapons and suspected of being a “systematic child rapist,”
They drip with moronic insanity-----POW Flag: The New Symbol of Racism?
Michael Swartz: POW Flag: The New Symbol of Racism? — The Patriot Post
Like most leftists, author Rick Perlstein is not a fan of our nation’s efforts in Vietnam, despite the fact he was born in 1969 and, thus, too young to remember much of it himself.
Thanks to an op-ed in the progressive Washington Spectator that was picked up by the now online-only Newsweek magazine, we’ve learned that a venerable symbol of that war was just another example of American racism.
Perlstein opens the article by saying,
“You know that racist flag?
The one that supposedly honors history but actually spreads a pernicious myth?
And is useful only to venal right-wing politicians who wish to exploit hatred by calling it heritage? It’s past time to pull it down.”
“Oh, wait.
You thought I was referring to the Confederate flag. Actually,
I’m talking about the POW-MIA flag....”
Like most leftists, author Rick Perlstein is not a fan of our nation’s efforts in Vietnam, despite the fact he was born in 1969 and, thus, too young to remember much of it himself.
Thanks to an op-ed in the progressive Washington Spectator that was picked up by the now online-only Newsweek magazine, we’ve learned that a venerable symbol of that war was just another example of American racism.
Perlstein opens the article by saying,
“You know that racist flag?
The one that supposedly honors history but actually spreads a pernicious myth?
And is useful only to venal right-wing politicians who wish to exploit hatred by calling it heritage? It’s past time to pull it down.”
“Oh, wait.
You thought I was referring to the Confederate flag. Actually,
I’m talking about the POW-MIA flag....”
Cruz Demands Obama Come Clean on Terrorist Immigrants - Tea Party News
Cruz Demands Obama Come Clean on Terrorist Immigrants - Tea Party News:
"72 cases documented in last year as record wave of immigration continues
(The Hill) – Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) wants the Obama administration to hand over details on dozens of individuals he says are tied to terrorism, including their immigration status.
Cruz, who is running for president, and Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) sent a letter on Wednesday to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Secretary of State John Kerry. They are asking for information on 72 individuals and the “nexus between terrorism and our immigration system.”
"72 cases documented in last year as record wave of immigration continues
(The Hill) – Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) wants the Obama administration to hand over details on dozens of individuals he says are tied to terrorism, including their immigration status.
Cruz, who is running for president, and Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) sent a letter on Wednesday to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and Secretary of State John Kerry. They are asking for information on 72 individuals and the “nexus between terrorism and our immigration system.”
Mukasey’s judgment
Mukasey’s judgment | Power Line
Former federal judge and Attorney General Michael Mukasey provides a lucid tutorial in the law applicable to Hillary Clinton’s use of her home-based email/server for official business. Mr. Mukasey’s tutorial comes in the form of the Wall Street Journal column “Clinton defies the law and common sense” (accessible via Google here).
Drawing both on his expertise and his experience, he concludes:
It is no answer to say, as Mrs. Clinton did at one time, that emails were not marked classified when sent or received.
Of course they were not; there is no little creature sitting on the shoulders of public officials classifying words as they are uttered and sent.
But the laws are concerned with the sensitivity of information, not the sensitivity of the markings on whatever may contain the information.
The culture in Washington, particularly among senior-executive officials, is pervasively risk-averse, and has been for some time.
When I took office as U.S. attorney general in 2007, members of my staff saw to it that I stopped carrying a BlackBerry, lest I inadvertently send confidential information over an insecure network or lest it be activated, without my knowledge, and my communications monitored.
When I attended my first briefing in a secure facility, and brought a pad to take notes, my chief of staff leaned over and wrote in bold capital letters at the top of the first page, “TS/SCI,” meaning Top Secret, Secure Compartmentalized Information—which is to say, information that may be looked at only in what is known as a SCIF, a Secure, Compartmentalized Information Facility.
My office was considered a SCIF; my apartment was not.
The point he was making by doing that—and this is just the point that seems to have eluded the former secretary of state—is one of common sense:
Once you assume a public office, your communications about anything having to do with your job are not your personal business or property.
They are the public’s business and the public’s property, and are to be treated as no different from communications of like sensitivity.
That something so obvious could have eluded Mrs. Clinton raises questions about her suitability both for the office she held and for the office she seeks.
A reasonable reader might disagree with Mr. Mukasey that what we know now only “raises questions about” Hillary Clinton/s suitability for higher office, but Mukasey’s tact adds to the power of his conclusion.
Whole thing accessible here.
Former federal judge and Attorney General Michael Mukasey provides a lucid tutorial in the law applicable to Hillary Clinton’s use of her home-based email/server for official business. Mr. Mukasey’s tutorial comes in the form of the Wall Street Journal column “Clinton defies the law and common sense” (accessible via Google here).
Drawing both on his expertise and his experience, he concludes:
It is no answer to say, as Mrs. Clinton did at one time, that emails were not marked classified when sent or received.
Of course they were not; there is no little creature sitting on the shoulders of public officials classifying words as they are uttered and sent.
But the laws are concerned with the sensitivity of information, not the sensitivity of the markings on whatever may contain the information.
The culture in Washington, particularly among senior-executive officials, is pervasively risk-averse, and has been for some time.
When I took office as U.S. attorney general in 2007, members of my staff saw to it that I stopped carrying a BlackBerry, lest I inadvertently send confidential information over an insecure network or lest it be activated, without my knowledge, and my communications monitored.
When I attended my first briefing in a secure facility, and brought a pad to take notes, my chief of staff leaned over and wrote in bold capital letters at the top of the first page, “TS/SCI,” meaning Top Secret, Secure Compartmentalized Information—which is to say, information that may be looked at only in what is known as a SCIF, a Secure, Compartmentalized Information Facility.
My office was considered a SCIF; my apartment was not.
The point he was making by doing that—and this is just the point that seems to have eluded the former secretary of state—is one of common sense:
Once you assume a public office, your communications about anything having to do with your job are not your personal business or property.
They are the public’s business and the public’s property, and are to be treated as no different from communications of like sensitivity.
That something so obvious could have eluded Mrs. Clinton raises questions about her suitability both for the office she held and for the office she seeks.
A reasonable reader might disagree with Mr. Mukasey that what we know now only “raises questions about” Hillary Clinton/s suitability for higher office, but Mukasey’s tact adds to the power of his conclusion.
Whole thing accessible here.
Ted Cruz Storms the South to Sold Out Crowds - Breitbart
Ted Cruz Storms the South to Sold Out Crowds - Breitbart:
"Every single event has seen sold out or over capacity crowds, Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler told Breitbart News.
“After the debate—we feel like we got a really big bump out of the debate,” Tyler said, citing the recent NBC News poll that had Cruz in second place. “Within a hundred hours after the debate we raised over a million dollars.”
"Every single event has seen sold out or over capacity crowds, Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler told Breitbart News.
“After the debate—we feel like we got a really big bump out of the debate,” Tyler said, citing the recent NBC News poll that had Cruz in second place. “Within a hundred hours after the debate we raised over a million dollars.”
Yes, they are cheating. And they will win unless SOMEONE starts shouting!!!-----Unlocking Democracy: Inside the Most Insecure Voting Machines in America
Unlocking Democracy: Inside the Most Insecure Voting Machines in America
Like hundreds of thousands of other Virginians, I’ve been casting ballots for over a decade using Winvote voting machines.
I now have physical proof of how catastrophically insecure those machines are.
It’s a tiny key that opens the plastic door hiding the USB port on every Winvote terminal.
This keepsake came my way at an eye-opening presentation about voting-machine security at this past Tuesday’s Usenix Security Symposium in Washington.
Jeremy Epstein, a security scientist with SRI International, has spent years investigating the weaknesses of these and other electronic voting systems.
But even he didn’t know how bad Winvote terminals were until this past April.
That’s when the Virginia Information Technologies Agency condemned the security of these machines and banned them from the commonwealth.
Their only remaining use was, literally, as a lesson to others.
Epstein led off his his talk by asking the audience if any of us would like a Winvote key.
(“All the keys are the same for every Winvote that’s ever been made, because that way it’s easier,” he pointed out.)
How about one of the smart cards that poll workers used to administer these machines?
I took one of each.
He also offered us one of the spare Winvote terminals he had stashed in his car, but I passed on that.
Among other things, the Act banned punched-card and mechanical-lever voting machines.
That in turn led to a rush to implement digital voting systems such as Winvote.
Outside of Virginia, only a few counties in Pennsylvania and Mississippi adopted Winvote (from the now-defunct Frisco, Tex.-based Advanced Voting Systems).
But Winvote terminals had much in common with other electronic voting machines of that time: They were built to win government contracts.
And they were based on general-purpose Windows platforms that made them needlessly complex and vulnerable to exploits.
On top of that, vendors paid too little attention to configuring those systems for security.
(See, for example, the flaws in Diebold’s voting machines that Johns Hopkins University professor Avi Rubin documented soon after Maryland agreed to spend $55 million deploying them statewide.) The geniuses behind Winvote, however, botched the job worse than anybody else.
It wasn’t just the horrible voter interface.
(My favorite example of that: When you chose a candidate on the Winvote touchscreen, your choice was highlighted in red, with an “X” next to it — which by any normal interface standards looked very much like you were voting against that person.)
The innards were even worse.
As Epstein explained in his autopsy Tuesday:
• Winvote’s machine runs a version of Windows XP that hasn’t had patches installed since 2004 — four years before AVS deservedly went out of business.
• Its wireless network is “safeguarded” with insecure WEP encryption — and the password is abcde.
• The Windows admin password is (no, I’m not making this up) admin.
• Windows file-sharing is left on.
• The machine tracks votes using an obsolete version of Microsoft Access, in which the unencrypted database file is “protected” with a five-character password that a security tool cracked in seconds. (That password — shoup — apparently refers to a voting-machine company with a history of criminal indictments.)
• The system doesn’t log changes to that file.
• You can’t turn off the WiFi; if you remove the wireless card, the device won’t boot.
Like hundreds of thousands of other Virginians, I’ve been casting ballots for over a decade using Winvote voting machines.
I now have physical proof of how catastrophically insecure those machines are.
It’s a tiny key that opens the plastic door hiding the USB port on every Winvote terminal.
This keepsake came my way at an eye-opening presentation about voting-machine security at this past Tuesday’s Usenix Security Symposium in Washington.
Jeremy Epstein, a security scientist with SRI International, has spent years investigating the weaknesses of these and other electronic voting systems.
But even he didn’t know how bad Winvote terminals were until this past April.
That’s when the Virginia Information Technologies Agency condemned the security of these machines and banned them from the commonwealth.
Their only remaining use was, literally, as a lesson to others.
Epstein led off his his talk by asking the audience if any of us would like a Winvote key.
(“All the keys are the same for every Winvote that’s ever been made, because that way it’s easier,” he pointed out.)
How about one of the smart cards that poll workers used to administer these machines?
I took one of each.
He also offered us one of the spare Winvote terminals he had stashed in his car, but I passed on that.
- The e-voting gold rush
Among other things, the Act banned punched-card and mechanical-lever voting machines.
That in turn led to a rush to implement digital voting systems such as Winvote.
Outside of Virginia, only a few counties in Pennsylvania and Mississippi adopted Winvote (from the now-defunct Frisco, Tex.-based Advanced Voting Systems).
But Winvote terminals had much in common with other electronic voting machines of that time: They were built to win government contracts.
And they were based on general-purpose Windows platforms that made them needlessly complex and vulnerable to exploits.
On top of that, vendors paid too little attention to configuring those systems for security.
(See, for example, the flaws in Diebold’s voting machines that Johns Hopkins University professor Avi Rubin documented soon after Maryland agreed to spend $55 million deploying them statewide.) The geniuses behind Winvote, however, botched the job worse than anybody else.
It wasn’t just the horrible voter interface.
(My favorite example of that: When you chose a candidate on the Winvote touchscreen, your choice was highlighted in red, with an “X” next to it — which by any normal interface standards looked very much like you were voting against that person.)
The innards were even worse.
As Epstein explained in his autopsy Tuesday:
• Winvote’s machine runs a version of Windows XP that hasn’t had patches installed since 2004 — four years before AVS deservedly went out of business.
• Its wireless network is “safeguarded” with insecure WEP encryption — and the password is abcde.
• The Windows admin password is (no, I’m not making this up) admin.
• Windows file-sharing is left on.
• The machine tracks votes using an obsolete version of Microsoft Access, in which the unencrypted database file is “protected” with a five-character password that a security tool cracked in seconds. (That password — shoup — apparently refers to a voting-machine company with a history of criminal indictments.)
• The system doesn’t log changes to that file.
• You can’t turn off the WiFi; if you remove the wireless card, the device won’t boot.
Colo. Ruling About Religious Liberty Has Beck Demanding ‘What Kind of Country Have We Turned Into?’ | Video | TheBlaze.com
Colo. Ruling About Religious Liberty Has Beck Demanding ‘What Kind of Country Have We Turned Into?’ | Video | TheBlaze.com:
"Beck read more information about the case, saying Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips declined to make a wedding cake for a gay couple in 2002, citing his Christian beliefs. But Phillips has also said he has no problem serving gay people at any other time.
“I’m trying to understand,” Beck said. “I’m still in the United States of America, right? I can’t cite my constitutional right to the right of conscience?”
“We’re in trouble. If this is allowed to stand, every bit of your constitutional right is gone,” Beck remarked."
"Beck read more information about the case, saying Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips declined to make a wedding cake for a gay couple in 2002, citing his Christian beliefs. But Phillips has also said he has no problem serving gay people at any other time.
“I’m trying to understand,” Beck said. “I’m still in the United States of America, right? I can’t cite my constitutional right to the right of conscience?”
“We’re in trouble. If this is allowed to stand, every bit of your constitutional right is gone,” Beck remarked."
Wikipedia Wars: 'Controversial' Science Topics Are Edited More Often Than Uncontroversial Topics
Wikipedia Wars: 'Controversial' Science Topics Are Edited More Often Than Uncontroversial Topics | RealClearScience:
There's a silent war being waged on Wikipedia.
Entries on so-called "controversial" scientific topics are persistently edited to reflect ideology, not facts.
While topics like evolution, alternative medicine, climate change, and nuclear power are not scientifically controversial, they are politically controversial.
It is for this reason that those topics often fall victim to "edit wars" on Wikipedia, where users alter information to fit their biased beliefs or tarnish the integrity of the page with slanderous statements. Other users respond by correcting the changes.
Adam Wilson and Gene Likens, both based out of the University of Connecticut, were curious just how often this happens.
So they downloaded the complete revision histories (dating from 2003 to 2012) of three politically controversial scientific topics -- acid rain, global warming, and evolution -- and compared them to four politically uncontroversial topics -- heliocentrism, general relativity, continental drift, and the standard model in physics.
They found that significantly more edits were made to the controversial topics compared to the uncontroversial ones, and far more words were changed per day on average.
Table 1. Statistics summarizing the view and edit history of selected Wikipedia articles.
...To prevent misinformation getting loose, Wilson and Liken offered some advice.
"Users should be aware that content in Wikipedia can be extremely dynamic; two students could obtain, within seconds, diametrically different information on a controversial scientific topic. Educators should ensure that students understand the limitations and appropriate uses of Wikipedia, especially for controversial scientific issues."
There's a silent war being waged on Wikipedia.
Entries on so-called "controversial" scientific topics are persistently edited to reflect ideology, not facts.
While topics like evolution, alternative medicine, climate change, and nuclear power are not scientifically controversial, they are politically controversial.
It is for this reason that those topics often fall victim to "edit wars" on Wikipedia, where users alter information to fit their biased beliefs or tarnish the integrity of the page with slanderous statements. Other users respond by correcting the changes.
Adam Wilson and Gene Likens, both based out of the University of Connecticut, were curious just how often this happens.
So they downloaded the complete revision histories (dating from 2003 to 2012) of three politically controversial scientific topics -- acid rain, global warming, and evolution -- and compared them to four politically uncontroversial topics -- heliocentrism, general relativity, continental drift, and the standard model in physics.
They found that significantly more edits were made to the controversial topics compared to the uncontroversial ones, and far more words were changed per day on average.
Table 1. Statistics summarizing the view and edit history of selected Wikipedia articles.
...To prevent misinformation getting loose, Wilson and Liken offered some advice.
"Users should be aware that content in Wikipedia can be extremely dynamic; two students could obtain, within seconds, diametrically different information on a controversial scientific topic. Educators should ensure that students understand the limitations and appropriate uses of Wikipedia, especially for controversial scientific issues."
A New Rule Would Regulate Almost Every Type of Water in US.
A New Rule Would Regulate Almost Every Type of Water in US.:
"The Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers’ final water rule under the Clean Water Act seeks to regulate almost every type of water in the country.
And you don’t even need to get into the substance of the rule to know it’ll be a disaster.
Here are three signs that this rule should be killed off immediately.
The EPA engaged in controversial activities to help get support for the water rule.
It launched a video and social media PR campaign asking:
“Do you choose clean water?”
As if critics of the rule want dirty water.
And that was just one gambit.
According to the New York Times, “[l]ate last year, the EPA sponsored a drive on Facebook and Twitter to promote its proposed clean water rule in conjunction with the Sierra Club...”
...The water rule is a disaster.
There’s no maybe about it.
Even environmental groups are suing the agencies (albeit for not going far enough).
This rule isn’t about protecting water; it’s about protecting these federal agencies’ ability to regulate more water at the expense of property rights.
Congress needs to do what it can to stop getting pushed around by these agencies.
Its first job should be simply to kill off this rule immediately."
"The Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers’ final water rule under the Clean Water Act seeks to regulate almost every type of water in the country.
And you don’t even need to get into the substance of the rule to know it’ll be a disaster.
Here are three signs that this rule should be killed off immediately.
- Sign 1: The Regulating Agency Is Acting More Like an Advocacy Group Than a Federal Agency.
The EPA engaged in controversial activities to help get support for the water rule.
It launched a video and social media PR campaign asking:
“Do you choose clean water?”
As if critics of the rule want dirty water.
And that was just one gambit.
According to the New York Times, “[l]ate last year, the EPA sponsored a drive on Facebook and Twitter to promote its proposed clean water rule in conjunction with the Sierra Club...”
...The water rule is a disaster.
There’s no maybe about it.
Even environmental groups are suing the agencies (albeit for not going far enough).
This rule isn’t about protecting water; it’s about protecting these federal agencies’ ability to regulate more water at the expense of property rights.
Congress needs to do what it can to stop getting pushed around by these agencies.
Its first job should be simply to kill off this rule immediately."
Trey Gowdy Unleashed – “About Damn Time” We Got Hillary’s Email Server! - Eagle Rising
Trey Gowdy Unleashed – “About Damn Time” We Got Hillary’s Email Server! - Eagle Rising:
"Every explanation Secretary Clinton has provided about a week later was proven to be demonstrably false. This is just the latest one of those assertions that there was no classified info. I saw the clip this morning. she was very definitive – she neither sent or received classified information. Well, that is patently false. What I’m primarily concerned with is whether or not I’m going to have access to records that i need to do the job that the House asked me to do..."
"Every explanation Secretary Clinton has provided about a week later was proven to be demonstrably false. This is just the latest one of those assertions that there was no classified info. I saw the clip this morning. she was very definitive – she neither sent or received classified information. Well, that is patently false. What I’m primarily concerned with is whether or not I’m going to have access to records that i need to do the job that the House asked me to do..."
These chicks are nuts!!-----The Free Bleeders Clearly Have Not Thought About What Happens to All That Blood
The Free Bleeders Clearly Have Not Thought About What Happens to All That Blood | Parenting: "I’ve had many of the links for this post for over a year.
Unfortunately, I was sure the issue would come around again.
It did.
Last week, Kiran Gandhi ran the London Marathon while letting her period flow freely.
Yes, free bleeding is about women refusing to use sanitary products during their periods.
(And no, it isn’t a hoax. I will address that claim in a minute.)
These women argue that sanitary products are expensive and that women are forced by patriarchy pressure and shame tactics to use them.
While I agree that women should not be ashamed or embarrassed about periods, shame isn’t why women started to wear sanitary products.
As any woman who has done her own laundry can attest, blood stains.
Tampons might be more expensive than some think they should be, but they are certainly cheaper than rapidly replacing clothes that are stained or worn from scrubbing.
Furthermore, which creates more environmental waste, trashing some compressed cotton bullets or a monthly assortment of spent clothing?
Furniture presents a problem, too.
Under the free bleeding plan, women will need to spend at least five days a month avoiding sitting on un-wipeable surfaces (or they’ll have to add scrubbing upholstery and linens to their already overbooked days).
Then, we have the sanitary concerns, which should be evident in the name of the products.
Blood carries all sorts of biological hazards.
...And so, onto all of the other nonsense that is free bleeding, free bleeders might add a perfect example of how trendy western feminism only serves elite, progressive, usually white women."
Unfortunately, I was sure the issue would come around again.
It did.
Last week, Kiran Gandhi ran the London Marathon while letting her period flow freely.
Yes, free bleeding is about women refusing to use sanitary products during their periods.
(And no, it isn’t a hoax. I will address that claim in a minute.)
These women argue that sanitary products are expensive and that women are forced by patriarchy pressure and shame tactics to use them.
While I agree that women should not be ashamed or embarrassed about periods, shame isn’t why women started to wear sanitary products.
As any woman who has done her own laundry can attest, blood stains.
Tampons might be more expensive than some think they should be, but they are certainly cheaper than rapidly replacing clothes that are stained or worn from scrubbing.
Furthermore, which creates more environmental waste, trashing some compressed cotton bullets or a monthly assortment of spent clothing?
Furniture presents a problem, too.
Under the free bleeding plan, women will need to spend at least five days a month avoiding sitting on un-wipeable surfaces (or they’ll have to add scrubbing upholstery and linens to their already overbooked days).
Then, we have the sanitary concerns, which should be evident in the name of the products.
Blood carries all sorts of biological hazards.
...And so, onto all of the other nonsense that is free bleeding, free bleeders might add a perfect example of how trendy western feminism only serves elite, progressive, usually white women."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)