Important stuff you won't get from the liberal media! We do the surfing so you can be informed AND have a life!
Sunday, February 04, 2018
History for February 4
History for February 4 - On-This-Day.com:
Charles Lindbergh 1902, Rosa Parks 1913, Betty Friedan 1921
George A. Romero 1940, Dan Quayle 1947, Alice Cooper 1948 - Singer, musician
1789 - Electors unanimously chose George Washington to be the first president of the United States.
1824 - J.W. Goodrich introduced rubber galoshes to the public.
1904 - The Russo-Japanese War began after Japan laid siege to Port Arthur.
1932 - The first Winter Olympics were held in the United States at Lake Placid, NY.
1957 - Smith-Corona Manufacturing Inc., of New York, began selling portable electric typewriters. The first machine weighed 19 pounds.
1974 - Patricia (Patty) Hearst was kidnapped in Berkeley, CA, by the Symbionese Liberation Army.
1985 - U.S. President Ronald Reagan's defense budget called for a tripling of the expenditure on the "Star Wars" research program.
2004 - The social networking website Facebook.com was launched.
Saturday, February 03, 2018
Roger Goodell Defends Decision To Ban AMVETS Super Bowl Ad, Claims League Has Done Enough To Honor Military | Daily Wire
Roger Goodell Defends Decision To Ban AMVETS Super Bowl Ad, Claims League Has Done Enough To Honor Military | Daily Wire:
"NFL commissioner Roger Goodell defended the league's decision not to run an ad from AMVETS during the Super Bowl, citing the ad's political nature and echoing the league's bizarre claim that politics has no place in the NFL's single largest game of the year, and that the NFL has already done enough to honor veterans."
"NFL commissioner Roger Goodell defended the league's decision not to run an ad from AMVETS during the Super Bowl, citing the ad's political nature and echoing the league's bizarre claim that politics has no place in the NFL's single largest game of the year, and that the NFL has already done enough to honor veterans."
Europe: Making Islam Great Again
Europe: Making Islam Great Again:
- In Germany, 47% of Muslims believe Sharia is more important than German law. In Sweden, 52% of Muslims believe that Sharia is more important than Swedish law.
- A recent Belgian study, in which 4,734 Belgians were polled, showed that two-thirds of Belgians feel that their nation is being "increasingly invaded".
"We cannot and will never be able to stop migration", wrote the EU's Commissioner for Migration, Home Affairs and Citizenship, Dimitris Avramopoulos recently.
"At the end of the day, we all need to be ready to accept migration, mobility and diversity as the new norm and tailor our policies accordingly"...
Read on!
"At the end of the day, we all need to be ready to accept migration, mobility and diversity as the new norm and tailor our policies accordingly"...
Read on!
From The Onion. Think about that!----- FBI Warns Republican Memo Could Undermine Faith In Massive, Unaccountable Government Secret Agencies
FBI Warns Republican Memo Could Undermine Faith In Massive, Unaccountable Government Secret Agencies:
"WASHINGTON—Stressing that such an action would be highly reckless, FBI Director Christopher Wray warned Thursday that releasing the “Nunes Memo” could potentially undermine faith in the massive, unaccountable government secret agencies of the United States.
“Making this memo public will almost certainly impede our ability to conduct clandestine activities operating outside any legal or judicial system on an international scale,” said Wray, noting that it was essential that mutual trust exist between the American people and the vast, mysterious cabal given free rein to use any tactics necessary to conduct surveillance on U.S. citizens or subvert religious and political groups.
“If we take away the people’s faith in this shadowy monolith exempt from any consequences, all that’s left is an extensive network of rogue, unelected intelligence officers carrying out extrajudicial missions for a variety of subjective, and occasionally personal, reasons.”
At press time, Wray confirmed the massive, unaccountable government secret agencies were unaware of any wrongdoing for violating constitutional rights."
"WASHINGTON—Stressing that such an action would be highly reckless, FBI Director Christopher Wray warned Thursday that releasing the “Nunes Memo” could potentially undermine faith in the massive, unaccountable government secret agencies of the United States.
“Making this memo public will almost certainly impede our ability to conduct clandestine activities operating outside any legal or judicial system on an international scale,” said Wray, noting that it was essential that mutual trust exist between the American people and the vast, mysterious cabal given free rein to use any tactics necessary to conduct surveillance on U.S. citizens or subvert religious and political groups.
“If we take away the people’s faith in this shadowy monolith exempt from any consequences, all that’s left is an extensive network of rogue, unelected intelligence officers carrying out extrajudicial missions for a variety of subjective, and occasionally personal, reasons.”
At press time, Wray confirmed the massive, unaccountable government secret agencies were unaware of any wrongdoing for violating constitutional rights."
Why Democrats Really Don't Want To Reinstate The Citizenship Question
Why Democrats Really Don't Want To Reinstate The Citizenship Question:
"Most people wouldn’t take issue with the U.S. government inquiring about citizenship status in a population census, but in 2018 some Democrats consider it a radical act to ask the simple question, “Are you a U.S. citizen?”
Perhaps this doesn’t surprise you given the way liberals responded to Democrats’ loss in the government shutdown fight over the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, and their outrage over the White House immigration plan that would grant 1.8 million of them amnesty (a framework ironically also panned by immigration hawks on the right).
Still, the brazenness of the liberals’ indignation over this census question is really something to behold."
"Most people wouldn’t take issue with the U.S. government inquiring about citizenship status in a population census, but in 2018 some Democrats consider it a radical act to ask the simple question, “Are you a U.S. citizen?”
Perhaps this doesn’t surprise you given the way liberals responded to Democrats’ loss in the government shutdown fight over the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, and their outrage over the White House immigration plan that would grant 1.8 million of them amnesty (a framework ironically also panned by immigration hawks on the right).
Still, the brazenness of the liberals’ indignation over this census question is really something to behold."
Must read! I posted entire article. They are the ENEMY OF OUR COUNTRY-----A special kind of sleazy: Andrew McCabe's sneaky set-up of Reince Priebus
A special kind of sleazy: Andrew McCabe's sneaky set-up of Reince Priebus:
"It's easy to think of swamp things as just the Washington establishment, good people who are simply set in their ways, obsessed with protocol and tradition.
But then there's FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who shows what a real swamp thing is with his sleazy, deceptive, leak-trap set up for newly minted White House chief of staff, Reince Priebus. McCabe took advantage of Reince's open, honest, honorable nature ... and screwed him over for having it.
"It's easy to think of swamp things as just the Washington establishment, good people who are simply set in their ways, obsessed with protocol and tradition.
But then there's FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who shows what a real swamp thing is with his sleazy, deceptive, leak-trap set up for newly minted White House chief of staff, Reince Priebus. McCabe took advantage of Reince's open, honest, honorable nature ... and screwed him over for having it.
Oh it's a disgusting story!
Howie Kurtz reported it in his new book on the tumultuous early days of Trump White House called: Media Madness: Donald Trump, The Press and the War Over the Truth, which sounds like one worth reading.
Howie Kurtz reported it in his new book on the tumultuous early days of Trump White House called: Media Madness: Donald Trump, The Press and the War Over the Truth, which sounds like one worth reading.
McCabe is suspected of leaking damaging information about Trump and Russia to the press, not because there was anything there, but because there wasn't.
He just wanted to inflict pain.
He just wanted to inflict pain.
According to Kurtz, he walked up to White House Chief of Staff Priebus and out of the blue, told him privately there was nothing there to a New York Times story claiming that Trump administration's officials had had repeated contact with the Russians. “We want you to know that everything in this New York Times story is bull--,” Kurtz reported him saying.
Being an honorable sort of person, Priebus asked McCabe if it would be all right if the FBI could say that in public. He was under great pressure from the press frenzy trying to fill out the New York Times' story. McCabe demurred to his boss, then-FBI Director James Comey, and Comey, of course, refused. As a bone, he offered to testify to that in Congress, but obviously, that was a long time off.
So here Priebus was, with information exonerating the Trump administration, and he wanted to honor McCabe's request, as if the truth itself out there was McCabe's personal possession, safer in McCabe's hands. O.K., that was a bit weak, but it was understandable. Priebus's real problem was that he didn't know he was dealing with a snake.
After all, get a load of McCabe's visage.
Look at him! Imagine you are Reince Priebus and this guy is telling you he knows your team is innocent. Look at the earnestness, the boyishness, the big green eyes, the retro glasses, all suggestive of 1960s Efrem Zimbalist, Jr. FBI values.
Nope, he was a snake.
Because as Priebus and other White House staff were mauled in the press feeding frenzy, a new story came out, one that Kurtz suspects McCabe could have been the only possible leaker for, unless it was Comey.
Kurtz writes:
Now, a week later, CNN was airing a breaking news story naming Priebus. According to “multiple U.S. officials,” the network said, “the FBI rejected a White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump’s associates and Russians known to U.S. intelligence.”Priebus was stunned by the implication that he was pressuring law enforcement. Had he been set up? Why was the FBI leaking this information when one of its top officials had initiated the conversation?Comey assured Priebus that afternoon that he hadn’t done anything wrong, but the story reverberated for days. “Is Reince Priebus Lying About the FBI?” Slate asked. “Reince Priebus Should Resign,” a Boston Globe columnist demanded. The damage was done.
What kind of a person does that to someone trying to protect him and keep open lines of communication?
What kind of a sleazy operative or power player?
Priebus was dealing with a swamp thing, not just of manners, but morals.
And this is the guy James Comey claimed 'stood tall' against all the "small people" who got wise to his games and got rid of him.
What kind of a sleazy operative or power player?
Priebus was dealing with a swamp thing, not just of manners, but morals.
And this is the guy James Comey claimed 'stood tall' against all the "small people" who got wise to his games and got rid of him.
Does the FBI need a good hosing out or what?
These are dangerous, underhanded people who play unfathomably lowdown, dirty games."
These are dangerous, underhanded people who play unfathomably lowdown, dirty games."
AYN RAND DIDN’T WRITE THE RETURN OF THE PRIMITIVE AS A HOW-TO GUIDE: ‘Credible Philosophers’ Attri…
Instapundit » Blog Archive » AYN RAND DIDN’T WRITE THE RETURN OF THE PRIMITIVE AS A HOW-TO GUIDE: ‘Credible Philosophers’ Attri…:
"AYN RAND DIDN’T WRITE THE RETURN OF THE PRIMITIVE AS A HOW-TO GUIDE: ‘Credible Philosophers’ Attribute Consciousness to Inanimate Objects Like Rocks and Tableware.
"AYN RAND DIDN’T WRITE THE RETURN OF THE PRIMITIVE AS A HOW-TO GUIDE: ‘Credible Philosophers’ Attribute Consciousness to Inanimate Objects Like Rocks and Tableware.
“Credible.”--Posted by Ed Drisco
Donald Trump's 'Dreamer' deal puts the squeeze on Democrats - Washington Times
Donald Trump's 'Dreamer' deal puts the squeeze on Democrats - Washington Times:
"President Donald Trump told a listening State of the Union country that part of his border and immigration plan included a pathway to citizenship for 1.8 million illegals currently in America.
This is actually a politically ingenious move.
Trump-voting conservatives may be angry. But fact is, the announcement put the border issue squarely in the Democrats’ court. The left will either have to concede on other key border control matters — or admit hypocrisy.
Let’s unravel Trump’s message: "
"President Donald Trump told a listening State of the Union country that part of his border and immigration plan included a pathway to citizenship for 1.8 million illegals currently in America.
This is actually a politically ingenious move.
Trump-voting conservatives may be angry. But fact is, the announcement put the border issue squarely in the Democrats’ court. The left will either have to concede on other key border control matters — or admit hypocrisy.
Let’s unravel Trump’s message: "
Researchers debunk common food myths | ScienceNordic
Researchers debunk common food myths | ScienceNordic:
"...Two Norwegian food researchers have decided to tackle this question by examining the differences between what people think makes for a safe, healthy diet, and what food scientists recommend.
If “we are what we eat,” as the old saying goes, what should we be eating?...
If “we are what we eat,” as the old saying goes, what should we be eating?...
What should we eat or not eat?
The two authors interviewed a variety of food and nutrition researchers and asked them to summarize the science behind what foods are good for us, and foods that we should be more careful about.
“We have become more and more concerned with what we should not eat,” says sociologist Annechen Bahr Bugge in the book.
“The list of ‘no’ foods is getting longer.
And we now say something about ourselves through the food we choose not to eat.”
“The list of ‘no’ foods is getting longer.
And we now say something about ourselves through the food we choose not to eat.”
Additives, pesticides not that worrisome..."
Read on!
More college kids pledge to Remove Testicles if Trump builds wall! | The Great Army
More college kids pledge to Remove Testicles if Trump builds wall! | The Great Army
"As reported previously, 2 students at The University of California stated that they would publicly remove their penis’ if Trump enforced the existing USA-Mexico border wall.
In a continuance of this trend, 4 students at the University of Washington have promised to remove pieces of their reproductive anatomy if Trump builds the wall.
Washington Sophomore Trent Griliphaen said he was inspired by the movement at The University of California, and that he “thinks that Trump’s construction of the wall is just an extension of his penis, and an expression of Patriarchal rape culture. Really, by building the wall, we are raping the Mexican people, and I am no longer willing to be a perpetrator of rape culture. If I remove my penis, I am making a statement that I reject this mentality.”...
Read on!
"As reported previously, 2 students at The University of California stated that they would publicly remove their penis’ if Trump enforced the existing USA-Mexico border wall.
In a continuance of this trend, 4 students at the University of Washington have promised to remove pieces of their reproductive anatomy if Trump builds the wall.
Washington Sophomore Trent Griliphaen said he was inspired by the movement at The University of California, and that he “thinks that Trump’s construction of the wall is just an extension of his penis, and an expression of Patriarchal rape culture. Really, by building the wall, we are raping the Mexican people, and I am no longer willing to be a perpetrator of rape culture. If I remove my penis, I am making a statement that I reject this mentality.”...
Read on!
Where we get our "news"-----US Media Publications Ranking Q4 2017
US Media Publications Ranking Q4 2017:
SimilarWeb Top Ranked Media Publications, Q4-2017
SimilarWeb Top Ranked Media Publications, Q4-2017
Domains | Avg Rank Q4 17 | Avg Rank Q3 17 | Monthly Change | |
---|---|---|---|---|
espn.com | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
msn.com | 2 | 1 | -1 | |
cnn.com | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
news.google.com | 4 | 4 | 0 | |
nytimes.com | 5 | 5 | 0 | |
foxnews.com | 6 | 6 | 0 | |
drudgereport.com | 7 | 7 | 0 | |
washingtonpost.com | 8 | 8 | 0 | |
sports.yahoo.com | 9 | 12 | 3 | |
finance.yahoo.com | 10 | 9 | -1 |
Citizens United, U.S. Supreme Court decision, endures eight years after Obama prime-time attack - Washington Times
Citizens United, U.S. Supreme Court decision, endures eight years after Obama prime-time attack - Washington Times:
"The occasion was his first State of the Union address and the topic was Citizens United, a case the justices had decided in a 5-4 ruling a week earlier, dealing an uppercut to the campaign finance reform movement by ruling that interest groups’ political spending is protected speech under the First Amendment.
The decision rocked politics, and Mr. Obama predicted it would “open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections.”
In the first election after the ruling, spending did soar. Cash in congressional races leaped 46 percent and continued to tick up in the years since.
But spending on presidential elections has dropped since the ruling, challenging Mr. Obama prediction of runaway campaigns."
"The occasion was his first State of the Union address and the topic was Citizens United, a case the justices had decided in a 5-4 ruling a week earlier, dealing an uppercut to the campaign finance reform movement by ruling that interest groups’ political spending is protected speech under the First Amendment.
The decision rocked politics, and Mr. Obama predicted it would “open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections.”
In the first election after the ruling, spending did soar. Cash in congressional races leaped 46 percent and continued to tick up in the years since.
But spending on presidential elections has dropped since the ruling, challenging Mr. Obama prediction of runaway campaigns."
The Associated Press Stokes Racial Division, Smears Trump | Power Line
The Associated Press Stokes Racial Division, Smears Trump | Power Line:
"The Associated Press wages a daily battle against the Trump administration on behalf of the Democratic Party.
Its bias is manifest and unconcealed, but rarely do we see a hit job as outrageous as this one: Minorities hear division in Trump call for unity.
It is an article about Trump’s State of the Union speech, but it doesn’t quote a single word from the speech.
You can tell from the title that the president said something about unity, but the AP doesn’t tell you what it was.
President Donald Trump’s call for American unity in his first State of the Union address struck an us-versus-them tone for many minorities, raising questions as to what extent Americans are put off by a leader who continually draws criticism as bigoted and xenophobic.
Really? From whom? The AP, of course.
For many people of color, Trump’s address before Congress on Tuesday night hardly reflected a shift in his ideology or his bruising style of governance. It was not lost on them that the president simply softened what he’s been saying all along, particularly when it comes to immigration, and sought to add a veneer of tolerance by using the stories of people of color to illustrate his points.
Is that what “many people of color” think? I have no idea; the AP story quotes no one except a series of Democratic Party race activists..."
Read on!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)