“I would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. Wade because that would mean to me that their judicial philosophy did not include a respect for established decisions, established law….Roe v. Wade is a constitutional right that is well established.”
Thus spake Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), according to a CNN report.
But which Roe v. Wade decision does Sen. Collins stand by?
- There’s the imaginary Roe, which dictates that unregulated abortion be available throughout pregnancy.
- Then there’s the actual Roe, which permits states to leave abortion unregulated but also permits many laws protecting the lives and safety of mother and preborn child.
Where does Sen. Collins stand on First Amendment protections for peaceful pro-life witnesses outside abortion facilities?
After all, McCullen v. Coakley is “established decision, established law.”
Or does she consider peaceful pro-life witness to be an attack on abortion rights?
How about restrictions on public funding of abortion and abortion counseling?
The Supreme Court OK’d such restrictions decades ago.
Abortion advocates like Planned Parenthood and the ACLU Reproductive Rights Project use terms like “gag rule” to describe efforts to keep abortion providers out of taxpayers’ wallets.
In the Senator’s view, do restrictions on public funding amount to “hostility” to Roe v. Wade?...
Read on!