"...this nifty bit of research performed by Robert Schmad in today's Free Beacon will be enlightening. Cutting to the chase for the answer to the headline above:
The Free Beacon reviewed political donations over the past four election cycles from those who identified their occupation as "fact checker." $22,580 of the $22,683 in political donations that came from self-identified fact checkers during that time — a whopping 99.5 percent — went to Democrats and liberal groups...
That rounds off to 100%, of course, but those three exceptional souls do deserve some notice, so the Freeb's headline is best: "Fact Check: Nearly 100 Percent of Political Contributions From Fact Checkers Go to Democrats."...
I refer you to the Lewis “Scooter” Libby and Senator Ted Stevens cases I’ve written about here. In particular, the detailed account of the former case in the now defunct Weekly Standard. It was written in 2006 and is now in the Washington Examiner archives. If it is difficult for you to access, this more recent and less detailed article may help refresh your recollection.
Rather than focusing discussion on what the real or imagined harms may be, how to mitigate them, and how to help people, climate activists are taking the opportunity to blame “climate change” for the smoke....
“Peer-reviewed studies and verified satellite observations show beyond a shadow of a doubt that wildfires in the long term, mid-term, and short term have become less frequent and less severe as the Earth modestly warms. The likely reason is the measured increase in evaporation from the world’s oceans, which has resulted in more frequent global precipitation.”
That’s not the shocking part of the story, however... That’s because more than 90% of the data is “corrupted.”...
